Violations Overview

Over the course of multiple years, actions were taken on and around Lot‑2 in Montgomery, MA, that directly violated state and federal environmental regulations, property rights laws, and conservation procedures. These actions are documented below, with supporting evidence found on corresponding pages.

1. Wetland Fill Without Permits

What happened: Large sections of mapped, functioning wetlands were filled with gravel and soil to create buildable land.
Why it's a violation: Under the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act (M.G.L. c. 131, § 40), wetland fill requires a Notice of Intent and official permits — none were filed.
When: Approximately 2009–2011
Supporting evidence: Images on the "Disturbance" page, dated photo logs

2. Unauthorized Relocation of Wetlands

What happened: Certified wetlands were relocated multiple times — including one instance by Levesque Associates without my consent or oversight.
Why it's a violation: Only the Conservation Commission or DEP can officially revise wetland boundaries, based on scientific review.
When: 2009–2018
Supporting evidence: Wetland replication maps, original flag lines, photographs showing loam placement, flags moved by Attorney

3. Unequal Enforcement / Selective Cease and Desist

What happened: I was issued a cease-and-desist while nearby developers engaged in larger disturbances without facing enforcement.
Why it's a violation: Selective enforcement of state environmental laws can indicate abuse of authority or possible corruption.
When: 2009–2025
Supporting evidence: Timeline, letters sent to the DEP and other agencies, supporting witnesses

4. Failure to Enforce Endangered Species Protections

What happened: Land identified as Timber Rattlesnake habitat was blasted, clear-cut, and developed into house lots, to even disturb Migratory Protected Bird Species.
Why it's a violation: Both the Massachusetts and Federal Endangered Species Acts prohibit habitat destruction for listed species without extensive review and mitigation.
When: 2007 - 2012
Supporting evidence: Letters to Natural Heritage, eyewitness accounts, blasting and photo logs

Conclusion: Pattern of Violation and Inaction

These examples reveal a pattern where environmental laws were ignored or selectively enforced. One landowner — myself — faced restrictions while developers continued unchecked. Photographic evidence, legal documents, and official records all support the claim. The public deserves a full investigation.

Building Blocked by Covenants

Written into his covenants, Kevin Walkowski holds sole approval authority over any site work or construction.
I was told early on that my home design was “approved,” but Walkowski later changed his mind — after filling in his wetland.
My hired home builder said directly: “I won’t build a home without Walkowski’s written approval.”
According to the covenants, he can deny construction using “reasonable discretion.”
The State of Massachusetts advised that these covenants are enforceable and binding.
Sections 1–5 of the covenant documents confirm that no work can begin without Walkowski’s written approval.
Walkowski has the legal right to require a home to be torn down if built without his permission.

I trusted the seller — a Harvard-educated attorney. I purchased this land in good faith, but I was unknowingly signing into a system where one man held all the power to deny my family a home.

The State of Mass advised and directed me with the Covenants in force knowing I would fail.

1 - 5 again, lists everything that the Developer, Mr. Walkowski holds to legally stop any development. He seems to over ride all State authority's. His sole approval is needed before any site work can begin and the State of Mass let him develop this same vacant land.

Not only does Kevin Walkowski hold the Sole Approval, before any site work can be done, he can legally make you tear down your home.